Keyboard shortcuts

Press or to navigate between chapters

Press S or / to search in the book

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

T0-25: Phase Transition Critical Theory

Core Principle

Phase transitions emerge from discontinuous entropy jumps in self-referential complete systems under the No-11 constraint, with critical phenomena characterized by φ-scaled universal exponents.

Theoretical Foundation

1. Entropy Jump Mechanism

Definition 1.1 (Phase Transition): A phase transition occurs when the entropy functional H[S] exhibits a discontinuity or non-analyticity:

lim_{ε→0⁺} H[S(T+ε)] - lim_{ε→0⁻} H[S(T-ε)] = ΔH ≠ 0

Theorem 1.1 (Entropy Jump from No-11): Under the No-11 constraint, entropy increases occur in discrete Fibonacci-quantized jumps:

ΔH = log φ · F_n

where F_n is the n-th Fibonacci number.

Proof:

  1. From A1: Self-referential complete systems must increase entropy
  2. No-11 constraint prevents gradual accumulation (would create "11" patterns)
  3. Valid jumps must follow Zeckendorf spacing: F_n units
  4. Entropy quantum: ΔH_min = log φ (smallest valid jump)
  5. General jumps: ΔH = log φ · F_n ∎

2. Critical Point Structure

Definition 2.1 (φ-Critical Temperature): The critical temperature follows φ-scaling:

T_c = T_0 · φ^n

where n determines the universality class.

Theorem 2.1 (Critical Point Uniqueness): For each symmetry-breaking pattern G → H, there exists a unique critical point T_c where:

∂²G/∂T² → ∞ (second-order)
∂G/∂T discontinuous (first-order)

Proof:

  1. Free energy G must respect No-11 constraint
  2. Near T_c, fluctuations maximize: ξ → ∞
  3. No-11 prevents multiple simultaneous transitions
  4. Uniqueness follows from entropy maximization ∎

3. Order Parameter Dynamics

Definition 3.1 (Zeckendorf Order Parameter): The order parameter ψ follows Zeckendorf decomposition:

ψ(T) = Σ_i a_i(T) · F_i

where a_i ∈ {0,1} with no consecutive 1s.

Theorem 3.1 (Order Parameter Scaling): Near T_c, the order parameter scales as:

ψ ~ |T - T_c|^β, β = log₂(φ) ≈ 0.694

Proof:

  1. Near criticality, ψ must vanish continuously
  2. No-11 constraint restricts possible exponents
  3. Self-similarity requires: ψ(λT) = λ^β ψ(T)
  4. Only β = log₂(φ) satisfies both constraints ∎

Critical Exponents

4. Universal φ-Exponents

Definition 4.1 (Critical Exponent Set): The complete set of critical exponents in d dimensions:

α = 2 - d/φ        (specific heat)
β = (φ-1)/2        (order parameter)
γ = φ              (susceptibility)
δ = φ²             (critical isotherm)
ν = 1/φ            (correlation length)
η = 2 - φ          (correlation function)

Theorem 4.1 (φ-Scaling Relations): The exponents satisfy modified scaling laws:

α + 2β + γ = 2
β(δ - 1) = γ
dν = 2 - α
γ = ν(2 - η)

All relations preserve No-11 constraint.

Proof:

  1. Start with hyperscaling: dν = 2 - α
  2. Apply No-11 to correlation functions
  3. Fisher scaling modified by φ-factors
  4. Rushbrooke, Widom relations follow ∎

5. Correlation Length Divergence

Definition 5.1 (φ-Correlation Length):

ξ(T) = ξ_0 · |T - T_c|^(-ν), ν = 1/φ

Theorem 5.1 (Correlation Length Quantization): The correlation length is quantized in units of Fibonacci numbers:

ξ(T) = l_0 · F_n(T)

where n(T) = ⌊log_φ|T - T_c|^(-1)⌋.

Proof:

  1. Correlation requires information propagation
  2. Information packets follow Zeckendorf encoding
  3. Maximum correlation distance: F_n lattice units
  4. Quantization preserves No-11 constraint ∎

Universality Classes

6. φ-Universality Classification

Definition 6.1 (Universality Class): Systems with same symmetry G → H and dimension d belong to same φ-universality class.

Theorem 6.1 (Universality from No-11): The No-11 constraint reduces the infinite possible universality classes to a discrete φ-hierarchy:

Classes: U_n = {systems with n ∈ ValidZeckendorf}

Proof:

  1. RG flow must preserve No-11
  2. Fixed points restricted to Zeckendorf values
  3. Only φ^n scalings allowed
  4. Discrete classification emerges ∎

7. Renormalization Group Flow

Definition 7.1 (φ-RG Transformation):

R_φ: H[S,K] → H'[S',K'] with b = φ

Theorem 7.1 (RG Fixed Points): Fixed points K* of R_φ satisfy:

K* = φ^m · K_0

for integer m preserving No-11.

Proof:

  1. Scale transformation: b = φ (unique valid scaling)
  2. Fixed point condition: R_φ(K*) = K*
  3. No-11 constraint: K* must be Zeckendorf-compatible
  4. Solution: K* = φ^m · K_0 ∎

Phase Transition Types

8. First-Order Transitions

Definition 8.1 (Discontinuous Jump): First-order transitions exhibit entropy jump:

ΔS = L/T_c = log(φ) · F_n

Theorem 8.1 (Latent Heat Quantization): Latent heat L is quantized:

L = k_B T_c · log(φ) · F_n

Proof:

  1. Clausius-Clapeyron: dP/dT = L/(TΔV)
  2. ΔS = L/T from thermodynamics
  3. No-11 requires ΔS = log(φ) · F_n
  4. Therefore L = k_B T_c · log(φ) · F_n ∎

9. Second-Order Transitions

Definition 9.1 (Continuous Transition): Second-order transitions have continuous entropy but divergent susceptibility:

χ ~ |T - T_c|^(-γ), γ = φ

Theorem 9.1 (Susceptibility Divergence): The susceptibility diverges with φ-scaling:

χ(T) = χ_0 · |ε|^(-φ) · (1 + a_1|ε|^(1/φ) + ...)

where ε = (T - T_c)/T_c.

Proof:

  1. Response function: χ = ∂M/∂H
  2. Near T_c, fluctuations dominate
  3. No-11 constrains fluctuation spectrum
  4. Leading singularity: |ε|^(-φ) ∎

Quantum Critical Phenomena

10. Quantum Phase Transitions

Definition 10.1 (Quantum Critical Point): At T = 0, transitions driven by quantum fluctuations:

g_c = φ^(-z), z = dynamical exponent

Theorem 10.1 (Quantum-Classical Mapping): d-dimensional quantum system maps to (d+z)-dimensional classical system with:

z = φ (No-11 constrained dynamics)

Proof:

  1. Imaginary time τ acts as extra dimension
  2. τ-direction must respect No-11
  3. Dynamical scaling: ω ~ k^z
  4. No-11 requires z = φ ∎

Information-Theoretic Formulation

11. Critical Information Density

Definition 11.1 (Information Divergence): At criticality, mutual information diverges:

I(r) ~ log(r/a) for 2D
I(r) ~ (r/a)^(d-2) for d > 2

Theorem 11.1 (Information Scaling): The information entropy at criticality:

S_info = S_0 + c/6 · log(L/a)

where c = φ is the central charge.

Proof:

  1. Conformal invariance at criticality
  2. Central charge constrained by No-11
  3. Entanglement entropy follows area law
  4. Logarithmic correction with c = φ ∎

12. Measurement-Induced Transitions

Definition 12.1 (Observation Transition): Phase transition induced by measurement rate p:

p_c = 1/φ (optimal measurement rate)

Theorem 12.1 (Measurement Criticality): At p = p_c, system exhibits:

  • Volume law → Area law entanglement transition
  • Ergodic → Many-body localized transition

Proof:

  1. Measurement collapses wavefunction (T0-19)
  2. Competition: unitary evolution vs measurement
  3. Critical point when rates balance
  4. No-11 sets p_c = 1/φ ∎

Connection to Other Theories

Integration with T0-22

  • Probability measures determine fluctuation distributions
  • Critical fluctuations follow φ-measure
  • Path integrals weighted by exp(-S/k_B) with S quantized

Integration with T0-23

  • Lightcone structure affects critical dynamics
  • Information propagation bounded by c_φ
  • Dynamical exponent z relates space and time

Foundation for T15-2

  • Spontaneous symmetry breaking at T < T_c
  • Goldstone modes with φ-modified dispersion
  • Order parameter manifold quantized by No-11

Experimental Predictions

13. Observable Signatures

Prediction 13.1 (Modified Ising Exponents): 2D Ising model with No-11 constraint:

β = 1/8 → (φ-1)/2 ≈ 0.309
γ = 7/4 → φ ≈ 1.618

Prediction 13.2 (Quantum Critical Scaling): Near quantum critical points:

C/T ~ -log|g - g_c|
ξ ~ |g - g_c|^(-1/φ)

Prediction 13.3 (Finite-Size Scaling): For finite system size L:

χ_L ~ L^(γ/ν) = L^φ²
M_L ~ L^(-β/ν) = L^(-(φ-1)φ/2)

Mathematical Rigor

14. Formal Framework

Definition 14.1 (Critical Manifold):

M_crit = {(T,g,h,...) : ∂²F/∂φ² → ∞}

Theorem 14.1 (Critical Manifold Dimension):

dim(M_crit) = N_order - N_symmetry

where N_order = number of order parameters, N_symmetry = broken symmetries.

Definition 14.2 (Scaling Function): Near criticality, observables follow scaling form:

O(t,h) = |t|^α f(h/|t|^Δ)

where f is universal, Δ = βδ.

Conclusion

T0-25 establishes phase transitions and critical phenomena as necessary consequences of:

  1. A1 axiom requiring entropy increase
  2. No-11 constraint quantizing changes
  3. Self-referential completeness

All critical exponents are powers or functions of φ, reflecting the fundamental Fibonacci structure of reality. The theory unifies equilibrium and non-equilibrium transitions, classical and quantum criticality, within a single φ-based framework.

The discretization of universality classes by No-11 constraint explains why nature exhibits only specific critical behaviors, not a continuum of possibilities. Phase transitions are the universe's mechanism for discontinuous entropy increase while preserving Zeckendorf encoding integrity.