T0-25: Phase Transition Critical Theory
Core Principle
Phase transitions emerge from discontinuous entropy jumps in self-referential complete systems under the No-11 constraint, with critical phenomena characterized by φ-scaled universal exponents.
Theoretical Foundation
1. Entropy Jump Mechanism
Definition 1.1 (Phase Transition): A phase transition occurs when the entropy functional H[S] exhibits a discontinuity or non-analyticity:
lim_{ε→0⁺} H[S(T+ε)] - lim_{ε→0⁻} H[S(T-ε)] = ΔH ≠ 0
Theorem 1.1 (Entropy Jump from No-11): Under the No-11 constraint, entropy increases occur in discrete Fibonacci-quantized jumps:
ΔH = log φ · F_n
where F_n is the n-th Fibonacci number.
Proof:
- From A1: Self-referential complete systems must increase entropy
- No-11 constraint prevents gradual accumulation (would create "11" patterns)
- Valid jumps must follow Zeckendorf spacing: F_n units
- Entropy quantum: ΔH_min = log φ (smallest valid jump)
- General jumps: ΔH = log φ · F_n ∎
2. Critical Point Structure
Definition 2.1 (φ-Critical Temperature): The critical temperature follows φ-scaling:
T_c = T_0 · φ^n
where n determines the universality class.
Theorem 2.1 (Critical Point Uniqueness): For each symmetry-breaking pattern G → H, there exists a unique critical point T_c where:
∂²G/∂T² → ∞ (second-order)
∂G/∂T discontinuous (first-order)
Proof:
- Free energy G must respect No-11 constraint
- Near T_c, fluctuations maximize: ξ → ∞
- No-11 prevents multiple simultaneous transitions
- Uniqueness follows from entropy maximization ∎
3. Order Parameter Dynamics
Definition 3.1 (Zeckendorf Order Parameter): The order parameter ψ follows Zeckendorf decomposition:
ψ(T) = Σ_i a_i(T) · F_i
where a_i ∈ {0,1} with no consecutive 1s.
Theorem 3.1 (Order Parameter Scaling): Near T_c, the order parameter scales as:
ψ ~ |T - T_c|^β, β = log₂(φ) ≈ 0.694
Proof:
- Near criticality, ψ must vanish continuously
- No-11 constraint restricts possible exponents
- Self-similarity requires: ψ(λT) = λ^β ψ(T)
- Only β = log₂(φ) satisfies both constraints ∎
Critical Exponents
4. Universal φ-Exponents
Definition 4.1 (Critical Exponent Set): The complete set of critical exponents in d dimensions:
α = 2 - d/φ (specific heat)
β = (φ-1)/2 (order parameter)
γ = φ (susceptibility)
δ = φ² (critical isotherm)
ν = 1/φ (correlation length)
η = 2 - φ (correlation function)
Theorem 4.1 (φ-Scaling Relations): The exponents satisfy modified scaling laws:
α + 2β + γ = 2
β(δ - 1) = γ
dν = 2 - α
γ = ν(2 - η)
All relations preserve No-11 constraint.
Proof:
- Start with hyperscaling: dν = 2 - α
- Apply No-11 to correlation functions
- Fisher scaling modified by φ-factors
- Rushbrooke, Widom relations follow ∎
5. Correlation Length Divergence
Definition 5.1 (φ-Correlation Length):
ξ(T) = ξ_0 · |T - T_c|^(-ν), ν = 1/φ
Theorem 5.1 (Correlation Length Quantization): The correlation length is quantized in units of Fibonacci numbers:
ξ(T) = l_0 · F_n(T)
where n(T) = ⌊log_φ|T - T_c|^(-1)⌋.
Proof:
- Correlation requires information propagation
- Information packets follow Zeckendorf encoding
- Maximum correlation distance: F_n lattice units
- Quantization preserves No-11 constraint ∎
Universality Classes
6. φ-Universality Classification
Definition 6.1 (Universality Class): Systems with same symmetry G → H and dimension d belong to same φ-universality class.
Theorem 6.1 (Universality from No-11): The No-11 constraint reduces the infinite possible universality classes to a discrete φ-hierarchy:
Classes: U_n = {systems with n ∈ ValidZeckendorf}
Proof:
- RG flow must preserve No-11
- Fixed points restricted to Zeckendorf values
- Only φ^n scalings allowed
- Discrete classification emerges ∎
7. Renormalization Group Flow
Definition 7.1 (φ-RG Transformation):
R_φ: H[S,K] → H'[S',K'] with b = φ
Theorem 7.1 (RG Fixed Points): Fixed points K* of R_φ satisfy:
K* = φ^m · K_0
for integer m preserving No-11.
Proof:
- Scale transformation: b = φ (unique valid scaling)
- Fixed point condition: R_φ(K*) = K*
- No-11 constraint: K* must be Zeckendorf-compatible
- Solution: K* = φ^m · K_0 ∎
Phase Transition Types
8. First-Order Transitions
Definition 8.1 (Discontinuous Jump): First-order transitions exhibit entropy jump:
ΔS = L/T_c = log(φ) · F_n
Theorem 8.1 (Latent Heat Quantization): Latent heat L is quantized:
L = k_B T_c · log(φ) · F_n
Proof:
- Clausius-Clapeyron: dP/dT = L/(TΔV)
- ΔS = L/T from thermodynamics
- No-11 requires ΔS = log(φ) · F_n
- Therefore L = k_B T_c · log(φ) · F_n ∎
9. Second-Order Transitions
Definition 9.1 (Continuous Transition): Second-order transitions have continuous entropy but divergent susceptibility:
χ ~ |T - T_c|^(-γ), γ = φ
Theorem 9.1 (Susceptibility Divergence): The susceptibility diverges with φ-scaling:
χ(T) = χ_0 · |ε|^(-φ) · (1 + a_1|ε|^(1/φ) + ...)
where ε = (T - T_c)/T_c.
Proof:
- Response function: χ = ∂M/∂H
- Near T_c, fluctuations dominate
- No-11 constrains fluctuation spectrum
- Leading singularity: |ε|^(-φ) ∎
Quantum Critical Phenomena
10. Quantum Phase Transitions
Definition 10.1 (Quantum Critical Point): At T = 0, transitions driven by quantum fluctuations:
g_c = φ^(-z), z = dynamical exponent
Theorem 10.1 (Quantum-Classical Mapping): d-dimensional quantum system maps to (d+z)-dimensional classical system with:
z = φ (No-11 constrained dynamics)
Proof:
- Imaginary time τ acts as extra dimension
- τ-direction must respect No-11
- Dynamical scaling: ω ~ k^z
- No-11 requires z = φ ∎
Information-Theoretic Formulation
11. Critical Information Density
Definition 11.1 (Information Divergence): At criticality, mutual information diverges:
I(r) ~ log(r/a) for 2D
I(r) ~ (r/a)^(d-2) for d > 2
Theorem 11.1 (Information Scaling): The information entropy at criticality:
S_info = S_0 + c/6 · log(L/a)
where c = φ is the central charge.
Proof:
- Conformal invariance at criticality
- Central charge constrained by No-11
- Entanglement entropy follows area law
- Logarithmic correction with c = φ ∎
12. Measurement-Induced Transitions
Definition 12.1 (Observation Transition): Phase transition induced by measurement rate p:
p_c = 1/φ (optimal measurement rate)
Theorem 12.1 (Measurement Criticality): At p = p_c, system exhibits:
- Volume law → Area law entanglement transition
- Ergodic → Many-body localized transition
Proof:
- Measurement collapses wavefunction (T0-19)
- Competition: unitary evolution vs measurement
- Critical point when rates balance
- No-11 sets p_c = 1/φ ∎
Connection to Other Theories
Integration with T0-22
- Probability measures determine fluctuation distributions
- Critical fluctuations follow φ-measure
- Path integrals weighted by exp(-S/k_B) with S quantized
Integration with T0-23
- Lightcone structure affects critical dynamics
- Information propagation bounded by c_φ
- Dynamical exponent z relates space and time
Foundation for T15-2
- Spontaneous symmetry breaking at T < T_c
- Goldstone modes with φ-modified dispersion
- Order parameter manifold quantized by No-11
Experimental Predictions
13. Observable Signatures
Prediction 13.1 (Modified Ising Exponents): 2D Ising model with No-11 constraint:
β = 1/8 → (φ-1)/2 ≈ 0.309
γ = 7/4 → φ ≈ 1.618
Prediction 13.2 (Quantum Critical Scaling): Near quantum critical points:
C/T ~ -log|g - g_c|
ξ ~ |g - g_c|^(-1/φ)
Prediction 13.3 (Finite-Size Scaling): For finite system size L:
χ_L ~ L^(γ/ν) = L^φ²
M_L ~ L^(-β/ν) = L^(-(φ-1)φ/2)
Mathematical Rigor
14. Formal Framework
Definition 14.1 (Critical Manifold):
M_crit = {(T,g,h,...) : ∂²F/∂φ² → ∞}
Theorem 14.1 (Critical Manifold Dimension):
dim(M_crit) = N_order - N_symmetry
where N_order = number of order parameters, N_symmetry = broken symmetries.
Definition 14.2 (Scaling Function): Near criticality, observables follow scaling form:
O(t,h) = |t|^α f(h/|t|^Δ)
where f is universal, Δ = βδ.
Conclusion
T0-25 establishes phase transitions and critical phenomena as necessary consequences of:
- A1 axiom requiring entropy increase
- No-11 constraint quantizing changes
- Self-referential completeness
All critical exponents are powers or functions of φ, reflecting the fundamental Fibonacci structure of reality. The theory unifies equilibrium and non-equilibrium transitions, classical and quantum criticality, within a single φ-based framework.
The discretization of universality classes by No-11 constraint explains why nature exhibits only specific critical behaviors, not a continuum of possibilities. Phase transitions are the universe's mechanism for discontinuous entropy increase while preserving Zeckendorf encoding integrity.